↓ Skip to main content

Climate factors influencing effective use of geothermal resources in SE Poland: the Lublin trough

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Climate factors influencing effective use of geothermal resources in SE Poland: the Lublin trough
Published in
Geothermal Energy, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40517-021-00184-1
Authors

Bartłomiej Ciapała, Jakub Jurasz, Mirosław Janowski, Beata Kępińska

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Philosophy 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 68%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2021.
All research outputs
#14,324,223
of 18,593,253 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#62
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,061
of 357,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,593,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them