| Title |
Predictors of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00817-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jorge Iván Alvarado Sánchez, Juan Daniel Caicedo Ruiz, Juan José Diaztagle Fernández, William Fernando Amaya Zuñiga, Gustavo Adolfo Ospina-Tascón, Luis Eduardo Cruz Martínez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 3 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Belgium | 1 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 31 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,132,570
of 24,878,531 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#599
of 1,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,664
of 522,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#22
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,878,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.