↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Predictors of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Predictors of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13613-021-00817-5
Authors

Jorge Iván Alvarado Sánchez, Juan Daniel Caicedo Ruiz, Juan José Diaztagle Fernández, William Fernando Amaya Zuñiga, Gustavo Adolfo Ospina-Tascón, Luis Eduardo Cruz Martínez

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 15%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 18 25%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 17 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,539,944
of 22,570,871 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#476
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,096
of 424,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,570,871 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them

This page is provided by Altmetric.