| Title |
Comparative evaluation of SUV, tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR), and dual time point measurements for assessment of the metabolic uptake rate in FDG PET
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EJNMMI Research, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13550-016-0208-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frank Hofheinz, Jörg van den Hoff, Ingo G. Steffen, Alexandr Lougovski, Kilian Ego, Holger Amthauer, Ivayla Apostolova |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 41% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 13% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,645,563
of 23,278,709 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#149
of 571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,643
of 354,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,278,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 571 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.