↓ Skip to main content

Meta-Model and UML Profile for Requirements Management of Software and Embedded Systems

Overview of attention for article published in EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Meta-Model and UML Profile for Requirements Management of Software and Embedded Systems
Published in
EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems, March 2011
DOI 10.1155/2011/592168
Authors

Tero Arpinen, TimoD Hämäläinen, Marko Hännikäinen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Latvia 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 32%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 22 59%
Engineering 7 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 8%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems
#10
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,114
of 119,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 31 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them