↓ Skip to main content

Reconstruction of large oroantral defects using a pedicled buccal fat pad

Overview of attention for article published in Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Reconstruction of large oroantral defects using a pedicled buccal fat pad
Published in
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40902-018-0144-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sunin Yang, Yu-Jin Jee, Dong-mok Ryu

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Unspecified 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 58%
Unspecified 4 9%
Unknown 14 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,368,294
of 16,797,794 outputs
Outputs from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#3
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,235
of 161,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,797,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one scored the same or higher as 38 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them