| Title |
Is COPD associated with increased risk for microaspiration in intubated critically ill patients?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00794-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thècle Degroote, Emmanuelle Jaillette, Jean Reignier, Farid Zerimech, Christophe Girault, Guillaume Brunin, Arnaud Chiche, Jean-Claude Lacherade, Jean-Paul MIRA, Patrice Maboudou, Malika Balduyck, Saad Nseir |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2021.
All research outputs
#20,680,602
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#974
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#430,640
of 504,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#38
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.