Title |
Increased susceptibility to intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia in severe COVID-19 patients: a multicentre retrospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00812-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jean-François Llitjos, Swann Bredin, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Thibaud Soumagne, Mariana Cojocaru, Maxime Leclerc, Arnaud Lepetit, Albin Gouhier, Julien Charpentier, Gaël Piton, Matthieu Faron, Annabelle Stoclin, Frédéric Pène |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 9 | 36% |
Spain | 4 | 16% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Researcher | 5 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 17% |
Unknown | 50 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Unknown | 53 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,304,978
of 25,502,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#301
of 1,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,022
of 527,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#12
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,502,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.