Title |
Evaluation of the contribution of tropical cyclone seeds to changes in tropical cyclone frequency due to global warming in high-resolution multi-model ensemble simulations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40645-020-00397-1 |
Authors |
Yohei Yamada, Chihiro Kodama, Masaki Satoh, Masato Sugi, Malcolm J. Roberts, Ryo Mizuta, Akira T. Noda, Tomoe Nasuno, Masuo Nakano, Pier Luigi Vidale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 18% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 19 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 22% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 14% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2021.
All research outputs
#13,290,611
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#201
of 526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,233
of 504,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.