↓ Skip to main content

The Future of MOOCs: Adaptive Learning or Business Model?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
The Future of MOOCs: Adaptive Learning or Business Model?
Published in
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, January 2015
DOI 10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2475
Authors

John Daniel, Esteban Vázquez Cano, Mercè Gisbert Cervera

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 177 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 7%
Professor 12 7%
Researcher 6 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 3%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 119 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 6%
Engineering 9 5%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Arts and Humanities 5 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 120 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#496
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,185
of 377,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.