↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D and chronic diseases: the current state of the art

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D and chronic diseases: the current state of the art
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00204-016-1804-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanna Muscogiuri, Barbara Altieri, Cedric Annweiler, Giancarlo Balercia, H. B. Pal, Barbara J. Boucher, John J. Cannell, Carlo Foresta, Martin R. Grübler, Kalliopi Kotsa, Luca Mascitelli, Winfried März, Francesco Orio, Stefan Pilz, Giacomo Tirabassi, Annamaria Colao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 244 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Other 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Other 54 22%
Unknown 67 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Psychology 11 5%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 77 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,873,825
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#323
of 2,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,895
of 384,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#18
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.