Title |
Endoscopic lithotripsy for gastric bezoars by Nd:YAG laser-ignited mini-explosive technique
|
---|---|
Published in |
Lasers in Medical Science, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10103-013-1512-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yongping Mao, Haixia Qiu, Qingsen Liu, Zhongsheng Lu, Kaichun Fan, Yingcai Huang, Yunsheng Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 45% |
Psychology | 2 | 18% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,191,823
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#93
of 1,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,101
of 306,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,311 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.