↓ Skip to main content

Validation of non-invasive genetic tagging in two large macaw species (Ara macao and A. chloropterus) of the Peruvian Amazon

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics Resources, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 183)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Validation of non-invasive genetic tagging in two large macaw species (Ara macao and A. chloropterus) of the Peruvian Amazon
Published in
Conservation Genetics Resources, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12686-016-0573-4
Authors

George Olah, Robert G. Heinsohn, Donald J. Brightsmith, Jose R. Espinoza, Rod Peakall

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Bachelor 5 29%
Student > Master 2 12%
Unspecified 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 47%
Unspecified 3 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 2 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,074,564
of 8,286,032 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics Resources
#41
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,313
of 260,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics Resources
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,286,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.