↓ Skip to main content

A survey of Monte Carlo methods for parameter estimation

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
A survey of Monte Carlo methods for parameter estimation
Published in
arXiv, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13634-020-00675-6
Authors

David Luengo, Luca Martino, Mónica Bugallo, Víctor Elvira, Simo Särkkä

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Master 9 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 53 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 30 21%
Mathematics 13 9%
Computer Science 12 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Chemical Engineering 4 3%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 58 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#19,957,118
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#426,637
of 915,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,577
of 431,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#12,561
of 25,604 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 915,148 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25,604 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.