| Title |
Extra, Extra, read all about it!
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CVIR Endovascular, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42155-020-00192-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jim A. Reekers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Hungary | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,039,999
of 25,246,334 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#18
of 396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,943
of 521,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,246,334 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.