| Title |
Pilot trial of high-dose vitamin C in critically ill COVID-19 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00792-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Zhang, Xin Rao, Yiming Li, Yuan Zhu, Fang Liu, Guangling Guo, Guoshi Luo, Zhongji Meng, Daniel De Backer, Hui Xiang, Zhiyong Peng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 174 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 14 | 8% |
| United States | 9 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 5% |
| Mexico | 6 | 3% |
| Japan | 5 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 97 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 144 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 10% |
| Scientists | 6 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 268 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Researcher | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 133 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 140 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 183. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#223,595
of 25,820,938 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#19
of 1,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,516
of 531,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,820,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.