| Title |
Brazilian guidelines for the management of brain-dead potential organ donors. The task force of the AMIB, ABTO, BRICNet, and the General Coordination of the National Transplant System
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00787-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Caroline Cabral Robinson, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Anderson Ricardo Roman Gonçalves, Cátia Moreira Guterres, Cassiano Teixeira, Cinara Stein, Cristiano Augusto Franke, Daiana Barbosa da Silva, Daniela Ferreira Salomão Pontes, Diego Silva Leite Nunes, Edson Abdala, Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Fernando Augusto Bozza, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Joel de Andrade, Luciane Nascimento Cruz, Luciano Cesar Pontes de Azevedo, Miriam Cristine Vahl Machado, Regis Goulart Rosa, Roberto Ceratti Manfro, Rosana Reis Nothen, Suzana Margareth Lobo, Tatiana Helena Rech, Thiago Lisboa, Verônica Colpani, Maicon Falavigna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Mexico | 2 | 14% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,557,097
of 24,889,544 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#545
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,667
of 518,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#17
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,889,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.