↓ Skip to main content

Dedifferentiation: the return road to repair the intestinal epithelium

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Regeneration, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Dedifferentiation: the return road to repair the intestinal epithelium
Published in
Cell Regeneration, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13619-020-00048-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuan Liu, Xiaochen Xiong, Ye-Guang Chen

Abstract

In the March 5 issue of Cell Stem Cell, (Murata K et al. Cell Stem Cell. 26(377-390):e376 2020) reported that intestinal stem cell recovery after injury is principally through Ascl2-dependent dedifferentiation of absorptive and secretory precursors in mice. This study provides evidence for robust regenerative capability of the intestinal epithelium via dedifferentiation of absorptive and secretory progenitors in the crypt.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#15,659,831
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Cell Regeneration
#92
of 158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,312
of 398,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Regeneration
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 158 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.