↓ Skip to main content

Measurement site of inferior vena cava diameter affects the accuracy with which fluid responsiveness can be predicted in spontaneously breathing patients: a post hoc analysis of two prospective…

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 1,208)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
158 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Measurement site of inferior vena cava diameter affects the accuracy with which fluid responsiveness can be predicted in spontaneously breathing patients: a post hoc analysis of two prospective cohorts
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-020-00786-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morgan Caplan, Arthur Durand, Perrine Bortolotti, Delphine Colling, Julien Goutay, Thibault Duburcq, Elodie Drumez, Anahita Rouze, Saad Nseir, Michael Howsam, Thierry Onimus, Raphael Favory, Sebastien Preau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 158 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 25 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 32 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2023.
All research outputs
#442,722
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#41
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,330
of 528,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.