↓ Skip to main content

Measurement site of inferior vena cava diameter affects the accuracy with which fluid responsiveness can be predicted in spontaneously breathing patients: a post hoc analysis of two prospective…

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 884)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
119 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Measurement site of inferior vena cava diameter affects the accuracy with which fluid responsiveness can be predicted in spontaneously breathing patients: a post hoc analysis of two prospective cohorts
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-020-00786-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morgan Caplan, Arthur Durand, Perrine Bortolotti, Delphine Colling, Julien Goutay, Thibault Duburcq, Elodie Drumez, Anahita Rouze, Saad Nseir, Michael Howsam, Thierry Onimus, Raphael Favory, Sebastien Preau

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 19%
Other 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Librarian 2 7%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 56%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Unknown 9 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2021.
All research outputs
#372,856
of 19,140,651 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#33
of 884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,726
of 452,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#13
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,140,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.