↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of image quality with four positron emitters and three preclinical PET/CT systems

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Research, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of image quality with four positron emitters and three preclinical PET/CT systems
Published in
EJNMMI Research, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13550-020-00724-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jarmo Teuho, Leon Riehakainen, Aake Honkaniemi, Olli Moisio, Chunlei Han, Marko Tirri, Shihao Liu, Tove J. Grönroos, Jie Liu, Lin Wan, Xiao Liang, Yiqing Ling, Yuexuan Hua, Anne Roivainen, Juhani Knuuti, Qingguo Xie, Mika Teräs, Nicola D’Ascenzo, Riku Klén

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Engineering 3 12%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,143,035
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#127
of 557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,297
of 504,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 557 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.