↓ Skip to main content

Pre-harvest field application of enhanced freshness formulation reduces yield loss in orange

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Pre-harvest field application of enhanced freshness formulation reduces yield loss in orange
Published in
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40538-020-00191-7
Authors

Jaspa Samwel, Theodosy Msogoya, Abdul Kudra, Hosea Dunstan Mtui, Anna Baltazari, J. Alan Sullivan, Jayasankar Subramanian, Maulid Walad Mwatawala

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#18,774,803
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
#80
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,576
of 415,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.