| Title |
Ensemble flash flood predictions using a high-resolution nationwide distributed rainfall-runoff model: case study of the heavy rain event of July 2018 and Typhoon Hagibis in 2019
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40645-020-00391-7 |
| Authors |
Takahiro Sayama, Masafumi Yamada, Yoshito Sugawara, Dai Yamazaki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 16 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#15,656,702
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#365
of 524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,405
of 508,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#16
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.