| Title |
Closing well: national and international humanitarian workers’ perspectives on the ethics of closing humanitarian health projects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41018-020-00082-4 |
| Authors |
Matthew Hunt, Lisa Eckenwiler, Shelley-Rose Hyppolite, John Pringle, Nicole Pal, Ryoa Chung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 16% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,424,086
of 25,000,733 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#71
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,567
of 521,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,000,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.