| Title |
CIRSE standards of practice on gynaecological and obstetric haemorrhage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CVIR Endovascular, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42155-020-00174-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Rand, Rafiuddin Patel, Wolfgang Magerle, Raman Uberoi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 15% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 16 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,350,730
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#9
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,474
of 529,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.