↓ Skip to main content

Ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with SARS-CoV-2-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring ECMO: a retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with SARS-CoV-2-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring ECMO: a retrospective cohort study
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-020-00775-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles-Edouard Luyt, Tarek Sahnoun, Melchior Gautier, Pauline Vidal, Sonia Burrel, Marc Pineton de Chambrun, Juliette Chommeloux, Cyrielle Desnos, Jeremy Arzoine, Ania Nieszkowska, Nicolas Bréchot, Matthieu Schmidt, Guillaume Hekimian, David Boutolleau, Jérôme Robert, Alain Combes, Jean Chastre

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 36 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 36 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#11,942,167
of 18,823,067 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#630
of 872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,409
of 444,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#111
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,823,067 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.