↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the validity evidence of a high-stake, second language reading test: an eye-tracking study

Overview of attention for article published in Language Testing in Asia, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Exploring the validity evidence of a high-stake, second language reading test: an eye-tracking study
Published in
Language Testing in Asia, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40468-020-00107-0
Authors

Hyojung Lim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 2 33%
Linguistics 2 33%
Psychology 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#13,574,762
of 17,020,562 outputs
Outputs from Language Testing in Asia
#80
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,452
of 387,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Language Testing in Asia
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,020,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.