| Title |
P-SILI as justification for intubation in COVID-19: readers as arbiters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00774-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin J. Tobin, Amal Jubran, Franco Laghi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 8 | 23% |
| Spain | 5 | 14% |
| Brazil | 3 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 3% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 71% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 53% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,710,066
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#199
of 1,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,831
of 522,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.