↓ Skip to main content

Development of Integrated Land Simulator

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Development of Integrated Land Simulator
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40645-020-00383-7
Authors

Tomoko Nitta, Takashi Arakawa, Misako Hatono, Akira Takeshima, Kei Yoshimura

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 21%
Engineering 2 14%
Computer Science 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2020.
All research outputs
#14,976,265
of 19,404,461 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#324
of 435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,972
of 385,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#63
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,404,461 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 435 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.