↓ Skip to main content

Similarity assessment of quality attributes of biological medicines: the calculation of operating characteristics to compare different statistical approaches

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS Open, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Similarity assessment of quality attributes of biological medicines: the calculation of operating characteristics to compare different statistical approaches
Published in
AAPS Open, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41120-019-0033-9
Authors

Thomas Stangler, Martin Schiestl

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,982,524
of 19,368,131 outputs
Outputs from AAPS Open
#6
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,992
of 387,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS Open
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,368,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them