| Title |
Management of thrombocytopenia in the ICU (pregnancy excluded)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2110-5820-2-42 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thierry Van der Linden, Bertrand Souweine, Laurent Dupic, Lilia Soufir, Pascal Meyer |
| Abstract |
Thrombocytopenia is a very frequent disorder in the intensive care unit. Many etiologies should be searched, and therapeutic approaches differ according to these different causes. However, no guideline exists regarding optimum practices for these situations in critically ill patients. We present recommendations for the management of thrombocytopenia in intensive care unit, excluding pregnancy, developed by an expert group of the French-Language Society of Intensive Care (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF), the French Language Group of Paediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies (GFRUP) and of the Haemostasis and Thrombosis Study Group (GEHT) of the French Society of Haematology (SFH). The recommendations cover six fields of application: definition, epidemiology, and prognosis; diagnostic approach; therapeutic aspects; thrombocytopenia and sepsis; iatrogenic thrombocytopenia, with a special focus on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; and thrombotic microangiopathy. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 22 | 31% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 71% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#1,054
of 1,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,591
of 187,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.