↓ Skip to main content

Does landscape context affect pollination-related functional diversity and richness of understory flowers in forest fragments of Atlantic Rainforest in southeastern Brazil?

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Processes, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Does landscape context affect pollination-related functional diversity and richness of understory flowers in forest fragments of Atlantic Rainforest in southeastern Brazil?
Published in
Ecological Processes, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13717-020-00261-6
Authors

Karoline Baptista de Lima, Patrícia Alves Ferreira, Milton Groppo, Renato Goldenberg, Emerson Ricardo Pansarin, Roxana Cardoso Barreto, Guilherme Peres Coelho, Yago Barros-Souza, Danilo Boscolo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Other 3 6%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 41%
Environmental Science 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#16,490,096
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#111
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,640
of 422,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.