↓ Skip to main content

Good practices for the translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of clinician-reported outcome, observer-reported outcome, and performance outcome measures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Good practices for the translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of clinician-reported outcome, observer-reported outcome, and performance outcome measures
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41687-020-00248-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shawn McKown, Catherine Acquadro, Caroline Anfray, Benjamin Arnold, Sonya Eremenco, Christelle Giroudet, Mona Martin, Dana Weiss

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Professor 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 33%
Unspecified 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,452,639
of 17,067,437 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#79
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,678
of 385,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#39
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,067,437 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.