| Title |
Persistent left superior vena cava: clinical importance and differential diagnoses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-020-00906-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aynur Azizova, Omer Onder, Sevtap Arslan, Selin Ardali, Tuncay Hazirolan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 19% |
| Brazil | 4 | 11% |
| Germany | 4 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 68% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 35% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,257,557
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#47
of 1,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,746
of 437,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.