Title |
The EMPOWER Study: Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial of Vagal Blockade to Induce Weight Loss in Morbid Obesity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Obesity Surgery, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11695-012-0751-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael G. Sarr, Charles J. Billington, Roy Brancatisano, Anthony Brancatisano, James Toouli, Lilian Kow, Ninh T. Nguyen, Robin Blackstone, James W. Maher, Scott Shikora, Dominic N. Reeds, J. Christopher Eagon, Bruce M. Wolfe, Robert W. O’Rourke, Ken Fujioka, Mark Takata, James M. Swain, John M. Morton, Sayeed Ikramuddin, Michael Schweitzer, Bipan Chand, Raul Rosenthal, The EMPOWER Study Group |
Abstract |
Intermittent, reversible intraabdominal vagal blockade (VBLOC® Therapy) demonstrated clinically important weight loss in feasibility trials. EMPOWER, a randomized, double-blind, prospective, controlled trial was conducted in USA and Australia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 3% |
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 146 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 14% |
Other | 18 | 12% |
Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
Other | 36 | 24% |
Unknown | 30 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 29% |
Engineering | 20 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 5% |
Psychology | 5 | 3% |
Other | 18 | 12% |
Unknown | 45 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#801,041
of 25,331,507 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#59
of 3,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,117
of 177,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#3
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,331,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.