↓ Skip to main content

The evolution of punishment

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The evolution of punishment
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10539-012-9341-3
Authors

Hisashi Nakao, Edouard Machery

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 3 5%
United States 3 5%
Germany 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Unknown 58 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 35%
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Student > Master 10 15%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 20 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 23%
Psychology 12 18%
Philosophy 8 12%
Unspecified 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2014.
All research outputs
#1,825,746
of 7,550,716 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#127
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,578
of 97,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,550,716 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 62nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them