↓ Skip to main content

The use of patient-reported outcomes to detect adverse events in metastatic melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy: a randomized controlled pilot trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
The use of patient-reported outcomes to detect adverse events in metastatic melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy: a randomized controlled pilot trial
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41687-020-00255-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lærke K. Tolstrup, Lars Bastholt, Karin B. Dieperink, Sören Möller, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Helle Pappot

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 11 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Engineering 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Unknown 13 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,158,292
of 25,220,525 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#80
of 642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,769
of 429,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,220,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.