| Title |
Role of interventional radiology in line insertion on intensive care during the Covid-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CVIR Endovascular, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42155-020-00171-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tom Cavenagh, Sofia Katsari, Bhavin Kawa, Raham Karimaghaei, Vyzantios Pavlidis, Vasileios Patsiogiannis, Nikolaos Ntagiantas, Joo-Young Chun, Seyed Renani, Leto Mailli, Michael Gonsalves, Lakshmi Ratnam, Raj Das, Robert Morgan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| India | 2 | 29% |
| Singapore | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 38% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 54% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,985,348
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#67
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,313
of 419,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#13
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.