| Title |
The impact of saliva collection and processing methods on CRP, IgE, and Myoglobin immunoassays
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Medicine, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2001-1326-1-19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roslinda Mohamed, Jennifer-Leigh Campbell, Justin Cooper-White, Goce Dimeski, Chamindie Punyadeera |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 158 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 11% |
| Engineering | 9 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2012.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#851
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,397
of 186,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.