@deevybee This one came out (and was ultimately retracted) because I was reading it for inclusion in a meta-analysis: https://t.co/X6uYuxgiCb
RT @robinnkok: The saga ends: this paper was retracted late last year. I didn't know because the journal and editors never got back to me,…
RT @robinnkok: The saga ends: this paper was retracted late last year. I didn't know because the journal and editors never got back to me,…
RT @robinnkok: The saga ends: this paper was retracted late last year. I didn't know because the journal and editors never got back to me,…
RT @robinnkok: The saga ends: this paper was retracted late last year. I didn't know because the journal and editors never got back to me,…
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @robinnkok: The saga ends: this paper was retracted late last year. I didn't know because the journal and editors never got back to me,…
The saga ends: this paper was retracted late last year. I didn't know because the journal and editors never got back to me, thanked me or even acknowledged me. Anyway, you're very welcome @MedicalEvidence and @BioMedCentral. CC @RetractionWatch Hat tip:
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
Here’s a great point from @robinnkok on open peer review that he posted on our Facebook discussion group: “...open peer review only works if people are willing to follow up things when it goes wrong” Here's an example of when that doesn't work https://t.c
Trials "RETRACTED ARTICLE: https://t.co/5karkJoqb3 - Wellbeing therapy bas..." https://t.co/g4Olg50WuL
@JanneSeppanen @mattjhodgkinson I agree. But compare this case (I've still not heard from the journal, who's been ""investigating"" for over a year). Note the shitty one-sentence reviews of the reviewer who was also an author. https://t.co/VLrVjX8Zn7
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
When people lack working ideas in an hypercompetitive environment, this is what you get. Seen more subtle schemes, though. #CreativeScience #CrooksOnPublicFunding
Not that anyone cares over there https://t.co/VLrVjX8Zn7
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
Reviewer reviewing a paper he co-authored!!! Pathetic
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
@NeuronymousB @bruin_bas @kamerlinlab @schneiderleonid @koen_hufkens @RuneLinding @RickyPo @marcvanderkamp @jbrittholbrook @DeyIACS @PernillaWittung @MajaGruden @EssayWells Open peer review sounds great but only if editors are willing to act on issues. It'
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
@statsepi @CoyneoftheRealm The irony being that without open peer reviews, we wouldn't even know about this! https://t.co/VLrVjX8Zn7
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
@ProfMattFox Open reviews are certainly not a panacea though. I've been trying to get this shoddy (signed!) review work for BMC cleared up for almost a year now. https://t.co/ZMksbjWYxk
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
It's been 10 months of """investigations""" now.
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
@ADAlthousePhD @otavio_ranzani @statsepi I agree in principle - but even when confronted with shoddy quality many journals just shrug. See thread: https://t.co/VLrVjX8Zn7 It's just like with guidelines; they're a great idea but when they're not enforced t
Eight months later and I'm sure @MedicalEvidence and @BioMedCentral are still "investigating" and "cannot share details at this time". https://t.co/VLrVjX8Zn7
@sTeamTraen @Cee_Lee_ @RetractionWatch I've been trying to get a response on this one from @BioMedCentral for 7 months. After saying "Can't say anything, we're investigating" they started ignoring me. https://t.co/VLrVjX8Zn7
@JHolmesSheff What, you mean to say @BioMedCentral sometimes has... "editorial oversights"? https://t.co/VLrVjX8Zn7
@CoyneoftheRealm Thanks to this transparency, I am still trying to get an answer about this issue: https://t.co/VLrVjX8Zn7 But they've become unresponsive after half a year of "investigating".
@damomac @BrunoTersago https://t.co/lkDG28HwIN at least attiko has radiologists who are doing great research and getting published on MERIT
Soooo @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral , a new month, a new opportunity for you to pretend "you're looking into it and can't disclose details". How's the ""investigation"" been going since October 2017? 6 months of intense thumb-twiddling? https://t.co/VLrV
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral does it really take more than 4 months to investigate a case of someone reviewing their own paper?You're not actually doing anything, are you? https://t.co/VLrVjX8Zn7
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
So @MedicalEvidence it's been a month, how is the investigation going? https://t.co/VLrVjX8Zn7
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
There are obvious flaws in author-chosen peer review but this is ridiculous ;-) https://t.co/pjgK3NO109
RT @RickyPo: Are some @BioMedCentral co-authors reviewing their own papers: https://t.co/GSSUgTMHHE
O. O unbelievable! Read thread! https://t.co/dYFI1VgyZQ
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
Wow that's gross... https://t.co/8tkAOays1o
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @RickyPo: Are some @BioMedCentral co-authors reviewing their own papers: https://t.co/GSSUgTMHHE
RT @RickyPo: Are some @BioMedCentral co-authors reviewing their own papers: https://t.co/GSSUgTMHHE
RT @RickyPo: Are some @BioMedCentral co-authors reviewing their own papers: https://t.co/GSSUgTMHHE
RT @RickyPo: Are some @BioMedCentral co-authors reviewing their own papers: https://t.co/GSSUgTMHHE
RT @RickyPo: Are some @BioMedCentral co-authors reviewing their own papers: https://t.co/GSSUgTMHHE
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
@_Journalology Peer review hacked? https://t.co/0AfWKLkqii
RT @RickyPo: Are some @BioMedCentral co-authors reviewing their own papers: https://t.co/GSSUgTMHHE
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @CienciaxPueblo: Esto es de traca. https://t.co/FvOQDZXWQW
Esto es de traca. https://t.co/FvOQDZXWQW
RT @RickyPo: Are some @BioMedCentral co-authors reviewing their own papers: https://t.co/GSSUgTMHHE
RT @RickyPo: Are some @BioMedCentral co-authors reviewing their own papers: https://t.co/GSSUgTMHHE
Are some @BioMedCentral co-authors reviewing their own papers: https://t.co/GSSUgTMHHE
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
RT @robinnkok: Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/…
Hey @MedicalEvidence @BioMedCentral: coincidence or do co-authors review their own papers? cc @schneiderleonid https://t.co/LIUyrYn2wO https://t.co/5XeTmczNjt
WELL.ME - Wellbeing therapy based on real-time personalized mobile technologies, vs. cognitive thera... - http://t.co/HBp3XWjc