Title |
Neuromuscular blocking agents in acute respiratory distress syndrome: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40635-020-00348-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nehal Tarazan, Moayad Alshehri, Sameer Sharif, Zainab Al Duhailib, Morten Hylander Møller, Emilie Belley-Cote, Mohammed Alshahrani, John Centofanti, Lauralyn McIntyre, Bandar Baw, Maureen Meade, Waleed Alhazzani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | 7 | 16% |
Italy | 3 | 7% |
Spain | 2 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Hungary | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 23 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 65% |
Scientists | 7 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 12% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Librarian | 2 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 23% |
Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 35% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,516,926
of 25,052,270 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#31
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,477
of 427,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,052,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them