↓ Skip to main content

Description of a fossil camelid from the Pleistocene of Argentina, and a cladistic analysis of the Camelinae

Overview of attention for article published in Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 105)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Description of a fossil camelid from the Pleistocene of Argentina, and a cladistic analysis of the Camelinae
Published in
Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13358-020-00208-6
Authors

Sinéad Lynch, Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra, Ana Balcarcel

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,695,551
of 17,583,573 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Palaeontology
#36
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,344
of 383,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Palaeontology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,583,573 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.