↓ Skip to main content

A survey of studies in systemic functional language description and typology

Overview of attention for article published in Functional Linguistics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
A survey of studies in systemic functional language description and typology
Published in
Functional Linguistics, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40554-016-0030-4
Authors

Isaac N. Mwinlaaru, Winfred Wenhui Xuan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Lecturer 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 32 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 42 53%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Unknown 32 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2023.
All research outputs
#16,922,306
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from Functional Linguistics
#22
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,151
of 370,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Linguistics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.