↓ Skip to main content

Xenograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was associated with high graft processing infection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Xenograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was associated with high graft processing infection
Published in
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40634-020-00292-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willem Van Der Merwe, Martin Lind, Peter Faunø, Kees Van Egmond, Stefano Zaffagnini, Maurilio Marcacci, Ramon Cugat, Rene Verdonk, Enrique Ibañez, Pedro Guillen, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 36 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 37 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2023.
All research outputs
#13,606,077
of 23,655,983 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#106
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,313
of 416,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,655,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.