↓ Skip to main content

Precarious knowledge workers in China’s social transformation—a study of editors in the Chinese publishing industry

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Chinese Sociology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Precarious knowledge workers in China’s social transformation—a study of editors in the Chinese publishing industry
Published in
The Journal of Chinese Sociology, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40711-017-0053-6
Authors

Jianhua Yao

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 3 30%
Social Sciences 2 20%
Linguistics 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,275,238
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Chinese Sociology
#24
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,999
of 310,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Chinese Sociology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them