↓ Skip to main content

Synergy in fertility forecasting: improving forecast accuracy through model averaging

Overview of attention for article published in Genus, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Synergy in fertility forecasting: improving forecast accuracy through model averaging
Published in
Genus, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41118-020-00099-y
Authors

Han Lin Shang, Heather Booth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Mathematics 1 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#15,529,011
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Genus
#140
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,123
of 426,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genus
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.