| Title |
Benefits of an early cooling phase in continuous renal replacement therapy for ICU patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2110-5820-2-40 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
René Robert, Jean-Eudes Méhaud, Najette Timricht, Véronique Goudet, Olivier Mimoz, Bertrand Debaene |
| Abstract |
Lowering the temperature setting in the heating device during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) is an option. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects on body temperature and hemodynamic tolerance of two different temperature settings in the warming device in patients treated with CVVH. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 35% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 15% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 85% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#1,109
of 1,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,513
of 186,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.