↓ Skip to main content

Core outcome sets in cancer and their approaches to identifying and selecting patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Core outcome sets in cancer and their approaches to identifying and selecting patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41687-020-00244-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Imogen Ramsey, Marion Eckert, Amanda D. Hutchinson, Julie Marker, Nadia Corsini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 16 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,566,940
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#155
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,366
of 402,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.