↓ Skip to main content

Exploring differences in primary students’ geometry learning outcomes in two technology-enhanced environments: dynamic geometry and 3D printing

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of STEM Education, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Exploring differences in primary students’ geometry learning outcomes in two technology-enhanced environments: dynamic geometry and 3D printing
Published in
International Journal of STEM Education, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40594-020-00244-1
Authors

Oi-Lam Ng, Lian Shi, Fridolin Ting

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 14%
Lecturer 15 10%
Researcher 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 72 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 22 15%
Social Sciences 21 14%
Arts and Humanities 5 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 76 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.
All research outputs
#13,696,157
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#229
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,617
of 402,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.