↓ Skip to main content

M-learning: mobile phones’ appropriateness and potential for the training of laboratory technicians in limited-resource settings

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Technology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 260)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
M-learning: mobile phones’ appropriateness and potential for the training of laboratory technicians in limited-resource settings
Published in
Health and Technology, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12553-011-0008-x
Authors

Livia Bellina, Eduardo Missoni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Student > Master 7 19%
Lecturer 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Social Sciences 5 14%
Arts and Humanities 3 8%
Design 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,363,015
of 25,306,238 outputs
Outputs from Health and Technology
#26
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,134
of 141,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Technology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,306,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.