↓ Skip to main content

The normalisation of body gifting in Taiwan

Overview of attention for article published in BioSocieties, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

1 blog
1 Facebook page


2 Dimensions

Readers on

3 Mendeley
The normalisation of body gifting in Taiwan
Published in
BioSocieties, August 2015
DOI 10.1057/biosoc.2015.29

Hung-Chieh Chang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Social Sciences 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2016.
All research outputs
of 12,485,879 outputs
Outputs from BioSocieties
of 256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 262,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioSocieties
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,485,879 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.