↓ Skip to main content

“‘You lose your hair, what’s the big deal?’ I was so embarrassed, I was so self-conscious, I was so depressed:” a qualitative interview study to understand the psychosocial burden of alopecia areata

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 495)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
“‘You lose your hair, what’s the big deal?’ I was so embarrassed, I was so self-conscious, I was so depressed:” a qualitative interview study to understand the psychosocial burden of alopecia areata
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41687-020-00240-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie V. J. Aldhouse, Helen Kitchen, Sarah Knight, Jake Macey, Fabio P. Nunes, Yves Dutronc, Natasha Mesinkovska, Justin M. Ko, Brett A. King, Kathleen W. Wyrwich

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Unspecified 4 9%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 21 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Unspecified 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 22 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,212,292
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#7
of 495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,503
of 399,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 495 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.