↓ Skip to main content

“‘You lose your hair, what’s the big deal?’ I was so embarrassed, I was so self-conscious, I was so depressed:” a qualitative interview study to understand the psychosocial burden of alopecia areata

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 561)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
“‘You lose your hair, what’s the big deal?’ I was so embarrassed, I was so self-conscious, I was so depressed:” a qualitative interview study to understand the psychosocial burden of alopecia areata
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41687-020-00240-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie V. J. Aldhouse, Helen Kitchen, Sarah Knight, Jake Macey, Fabio P. Nunes, Yves Dutronc, Natasha Mesinkovska, Justin M. Ko, Brett A. King, Kathleen W. Wyrwich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Unspecified 3 4%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Researcher 3 4%
Lecturer 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 45 62%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Psychology 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 47 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,112,257
of 24,034,335 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#8
of 561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,535
of 404,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,034,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.